individuals, faith remained central, while for others Jewish identity
reflected cultural, ethnic, ancestral, historical, or communal ties. He
stated that many Jewish Americans did not identify as religious, yet still
identified as Jewish, carried Jewish history, participated in Jewish
culture, and experienced anti-Semitism. He stated that reducing Jewish
American Heritage Month to a religious recognition failed to reflect the
full nature of Jewish identity. Dr. Feibel referenced Ambassador Deborah
Lipstadt, appointed by President Biden as the United States Special
Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism, and stated that she had
described Jewish identity as broader than religious practice alone and
rooted in history, culture, peoplehood, memory, and pride. He stated that
Jewish identity had never fit neatly into a single category and described it
as a religion, a peoplehood, an ethnicity, a culture, a civilization, and a
way of life. Dr. Feibel stated that Jewish American Heritage Month
recognized those dimensions of Jewish identity and explained why
communities across Central Ohio had recognized and celebrated the
month without treating it as a religious endorsement. He stated that
Columbus City Council, New Albany, Reynoldsburg, Bexley, Westerville,
Upper Arlington, and the federal government had recognized the
observance each May. He stated that Council could not conclude that
such recognition violated the law. Dr. Feibel stated that treating the
recognition as uniquely difficult, risky, or inappropriate in Gahanna
communicated a message, whether intended or not. He stated that he
did not seek to assign motives, but instead sought to speak honestly
about the impact. He stated that when communities viewed other
heritage months as civic recognitions while treating Jewish American
Heritage Month as overly religious or complicated, Jewish residents and
their allies could reasonably interpret that response as a sign that others
misunderstood, minimized, or excluded Jewish identity from the public
sphere. He stated that although Council may not have intended that
message, the message carried significance in the current historical
moment. Dr. Feibel stated that the proclamation represented something
more positive by affirming that Jewish Americans belonged within
Gahanna’s civic story, that Jewish history deserved recognition, and that
Jewish contributions remained visible. He also stated that allyship
required action during ordinary moments of public leadership, not only
after tragedy. Dr. Feibel expressed hope that the proclamation would
become more than a ceremonial act and instead create a learning
opportunity and encourage further conversation. He stated that Jewish
Columbus welcomed the opportunity to speak with any Councilmember
seeking a better understanding of Jewish identity, Jewish American
Heritage Month, or the significance of the recognition. He concluded by