SUBMITTED RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE CITY OF GAHANNA TAX
INCENTIVE REVIEW COUNCIL FOR TAX YEAR 2024
City Attorney Tamilarasan stated that, pursuant to the previous
discussion of the item at Committee and questions raised by Council in
preparation for the last Committee meeting that was canceled, she
conducted research into the TIRC statute and contacted the Auditor’s
Office, which administers TIRC. She reported that, during discussions
with staff at the Auditor’s Office, they requested that Council postpone its
vote on the item to allow further research into compliance issues that
occurred during the TIRC meeting, including whether a sufficient quorum
existed to vote on the matters before the council, specifically regarding
the Mifflin Township incentives and abatements. She stated that her
office recommended postponing the matter to a date certain. She
requested that the item return to Committee of the Whole the following
week and proceed to second reading at the next Council meeting.
President Weaver asked whether Council had any questions for City
Attorney Tamilarasan. Hearing none, he requested a motion to postpone
the vote on Ordinance 0002-2026 to a date certain of February 16, 2026.
A motion was made by Bowers, seconded by Renner, that the Ordinance be
Postponed to a Date Certain, February 16, 2026. The motion carried by the
following vote:
7 - Bowers, Jones, McGregor, Padova, Renner, Schnetzer and Weaver
Yes:
I.
ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION, WAIVER & ADOPTION:
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS
AND WAIVING SECOND READING - TIF, State Capital Grant, Capital
Improvement, Water Capital, and Sewer Capital Improvement funds for
Capital Improvement Projects
Senior Director Schultz explained that, as part of the Capital
Improvement Plan, the CIP Advisory Committee and the structure of the
document required a process at the end of each year to return any
unencumbered funds for each project. He stated that, for projects
requiring reallocation, the administration would return to Council in the
early part of the year, which explained why the item appeared before
them. He noted that this marked the second time they had followed this
process and stated that the process aimed to increase transparency with
Council and the public. Senior Director Schultz stated that the attached
item included a list of projects that would receive funding back. He
clarified that these projects were not included in the 2026 budget request
but that the City returned the funds at the end of December. He stated
that the administration now requested the return of those funds to make
the projects whole. He explained that, in some instances, projects had
not progressed in a manner that allowed the City to encumber the funds,
but the projects had not stalled. He stated that the circumstances
reflected the natural life cycle of a project and that the funds remained