200 South Hamilton Road  
Gahanna, Ohio 43230  
City of Gahanna  
Meeting Minutes  
Committee of the Whole  
Jamille Jones, Chair  
Merisa K. Bowers  
Nancy R. McGregor  
Kaylee Padova  
Stephen A. Renner  
Michael Schnetzer  
Trenton I. Weaver  
Jeremy A. VanMeter, Clerk of Council  
Monday, January 12, 2026  
7:00 PM  
City Hall, Council Chambers  
A.  
CALL TO ORDER:  
Gahanna City Council met for Committee of the Whole on Monday, January  
12, 2026, in Council Chambers. Vice President of Council Jamille Jones,  
Chair, called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m. The agenda was published on  
January 9, 2026. All members were present for the meeting. There were no  
additions or corrections to the agenda.  
B.  
ITEMS FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION:  
A MOTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF GAHANNA BIDDING FOR THE  
2026 STREET TREE PLANTING PROGRAM  
Vice President Jamille Jones opened the agenda item from the Department of  
Parks and Recreation and recognized Director Stephania Ferrell. Director  
Ferrell stated that she had three items for Council consideration, all related to  
competitive bidding. She presented the first item as a request for permission  
to bid the Street Tree Planting Program. She explained that the program  
prioritized replacement trees and that residents would receive notification  
prior to any planting, with the opportunity to opt into the program. She noted  
that this marked the third year of the program and that, due to available  
funding and continued commitment to the effort, the program had reached the  
threshold requiring competitive bidding. She formally requested a motion  
granting permission to bid the Street Tree Planting Program. Vice President  
Jones asked whether there were any questions or discussion.  
President Trenton Weaver thanked Director Ferrell and expressed  
enthusiasm for the program’s progress. He asked whether the program  
targeted large areas with significant tree removals, particularly those involving  
hazardous tree replacements. Director Ferrell confirmed that this was  
correct. President Weaver then asked whether the City maintained a map or  
parcel list for the proposed plantings or whether potential vendors would  
propose locations within the scope of work. Director Ferrell responded that  
staff had identified a list of approximately 120 trees eligible for the program,  
but the final list of plantings would not be established until residents received  
notification letters and opted into the program. President Weaver thanked  
Director Ferrell and stated that he had no further questions.  
Councilmember Kaylee Padova stated that she was looking ahead to both the  
Street Tree Planting Program and the Street Tree Pruning Program. She  
asked whether bids for both programs would likely come from the same  
companies and whether there was a reason the two scopes of work were not  
combined, or whether they could be combined if the same vendor submitted  
the lowest bid for both. Director Ferrell explained that separating the scopes  
of work allowed the City to better understand the value of each service  
independently. She noted that while the same vendor could potentially be  
awarded both contracts, separating the programs remained beneficial for  
evaluation purposes. Councilmember Padova then asked whether the City  
could request better pricing if the same vendor were awarded both contracts.  
Director Ferrell replied that the competitive bid process governed pricing and  
that the City was limited to the bids received through that process.  
Recommendation: Introduction/Adoption on Consent Agenda on 1/20/2026.  
A MOTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF GAHANNA BIDDING FOR THE  
2026 STREET TREE PRUNING PROGRAM  
Director Ferrell introduced the second item and noted that it related to the  
same overall effort but involved a different scope of work. She stated that care  
of the City’s existing tree canopy remained a priority and that consistent  
management, including pruning, remained necessary to sustain that initiative.  
She requested a motion granting permission to bid the Street Tree Pruning  
Program. Vice President Jones asked whether there were any questions.  
Councilmember Nancy McGregor asked whether this marked the first year  
the City had pursued a contract for street tree pruning. Director Ferrell  
confirmed that this marked the first large contract of that nature. She added  
that the City had previously completed pruning along arterials to address  
low-hanging hazards and keep them out of the roadway and right of way.  
Recommendation: Introduction/Adoption on Consent Agenda on 1/20/2026.  
A MOTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF GAHANNA BIDDING FOR THE  
ACADEMY PARK RENOVATION PROJECT  
Director Stephania Ferrell presented the final item from the Department of  
Parks and Recreation and requested permission to bid the Academy Park  
Renovation Project. She explained that the project included multiple  
components, including a redesigned playground, an expanded shelter house  
to serve as a concession area, restroom facility, and trailhead, an improved  
parking lot with added stormwater infrastructure, a newly surfaced basketball  
court, and an improved on-site trail network. She stated that funding for the  
project was included in the 2026 Capital Improvement Funding Request and  
formally requested a motion granting permission to bid the project. Vice  
President Jones asked for questions and recognized Councilmember Michael  
Schnetzer.  
Councilmember Michael Schnetzer stated that he looked forward to seeing  
the project move forward and noted that the project had been discussed for  
several years. He asked whether the Parks and Recreation Department had  
considered potential disruptions to other programming at Academy Park,  
specifically referencing the Gahanna Junior League Sports “Gahanna Blast”  
travel baseball tournament typically held in late June or early July. He asked  
whether the department planned to communicate with affected stakeholders.  
Director Ferrell responded that staff understood the potential impact on Junior  
League Sports and other park user groups. She stated that the department  
had scheduled a meeting with Junior League representatives to discuss the  
construction schedule and timeline.  
Councilmember Stephen Renner referenced Director Ferrell’s memorandum,  
which discussed stormwater management and potential treatment. He stated  
that he did not recall this being discussed previously and noted that he  
reviewed meeting minutes with assistance from Clerk VanMeter that indicated  
it had been mentioned as a possibility. He asked whether the project would  
include green infrastructure and requested additional detail regarding the  
treatment approach. Director Ferrell responded that staff were currently  
working through the specifications related to a bioswale component. She  
stated that she would be happy to provide a follow-up discussion with more  
detailed information but was not prepared to elaborate further at that meeting.  
Councilmember Renner then asked whether the department had considered  
inclusive or interpretive signage to educate the public about the stormwater  
infrastructure and its function. Director Ferrell stated that enhancing  
interpretive signage represented a systemwide goal and that the department  
intended to expand educational opportunities related to conservation impacts  
throughout the park system, including this project.  
Vice President Jones asked about the number of parking spaces and  
requested a reminder of where the project stood relative to previous  
discussions. Director Ferrell responded that the existing parking lot included  
298 spaces and that the project would add 46 new spaces, with the intent to  
expand the parking lot accordingly.  
Councilmember Merisa Bowers asked whether earlier concerns about the  
project impacting field or play areas had been addressed. Director Ferrell  
responded that, due to the park’s design, the soccer fields and associated  
green space would not be impacted.  
Councilmember Kaylee Padova asked whether the Goblin Trail, which she  
noted was well loved by the community, would be affected by the project.  
Director Ferrell responded that there was a strong possibility the trail would  
be impacted. She stated that staff would make appropriate adjustments to  
ensure the trail was not simply eliminated and that an alternative plan would  
be developed.  
Recommendation: Introduction/Adoption on Consent Agenda on 1/20/2026.  
C.  
ITEMS FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING:  
A MOTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF GAHANNA BIDDING FOR THE  
2026 STREET & SIDEWALK PROGRAM (ST-1122)  
Senior Director Kevin Schultz presented items from the Department of  
Engineering. He stated that he would present two items, both requests for  
permission to bid, like items previously presented by the Department of Parks  
and Recreation. Senior Director Schultz introduced the first item as a request  
for permission to bid the 2026 Street and Sidewalk Program. He explained  
that the program included the same scope of work completed in recent years,  
including curb repairs, crack sealing, micro-resurfacing, and other  
preservation treatments on selected streets. He stated that a map attached to  
the agenda identified streets scheduled for crack sealing versus other  
maintenance activities. He formally requested permission to bid the 2026  
Street and Sidewalk Program. Vice President Jones asked whether there  
were any questions.  
President Weaver asked whether the selection of streets for the program was  
based on a recently completed pavement analysis or rating. Senior Director  
Schultz responded that the Engineering Department planned to complete the  
pavement assessment in the spring of 2026. He noted that the assessment  
had originally been scheduled for the fall but was delayed due to an  
insufficient number of responses to the request for proposals process.  
President Weaver asked whether the list of streets could change following  
completion of the pavement assessment. Senior Director Schultz confirmed  
that the list for the current program would not change but that future programs  
could be affected. President Weaver then asked whether Council would be  
able to review the assessment data once it was completed. Senior Director  
Schultz stated that staff would share the information once it was compiled.  
Mayor Jadwin acknowledged that the data might be difficult to interpret.  
President Weaver stated that it would be helpful, noting that residents  
frequently asked when their streets would be paved. He explained that  
understanding the assessment would help address questions about why  
some streets received repairs more frequently than others. Senior Director  
Schultz agreed.  
Recommendation: Introduction/Adoption on Consent Agenda on 1/20/2026.  
A MOTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF GAHANNA BIDDING FOR THE  
2026 SIDEWALK LOOKBACK PROGRAM (ST-1123)  
Senior Director Kevin Schultz introduced the second item from the  
Department of Engineering as a request for permission to bid the 2026  
Sidewalk Lookback Program. He explained that, following the 2021-2023  
Street Program, the City elected to perform sidewalk maintenance on those  
same streets. He stated that this item represented the next set of streets  
included in the lookback program and noted that the streets were listed in the  
report by individual street and intersection. He formally requested permission  
to bid the 2026 Sidewalk Lookback Program.  
Councilmember Nancy McGregor asked whether the program included  
driveway aprons. Senior Director Schultz responded that the program did not  
include driveway aprons and applied only to the pedestrian sidewalk facility  
running through each parcel. Councilmember McGregor asked whether  
driveway aprons were addressed under the first item previously discussed.  
Senior Director Schultz explained that apron work fell under the Street  
Rebuild Program, which Council had approved earlier, and clarified that the  
Street Rebuild Program did include full curb, gutter, and driveway apron  
replacement. Councilmember McGregor commented that the City had  
received many complaints the previous year regarding partial apron  
replacements and stated that half-apron work looked poor. She asked  
whether the City could complete full apron replacements. Senior Director  
Schultz responded that driveway aprons represented the most expensive  
concrete component of the work and that, in many cases, apron maintenance  
remained the responsibility of the property owner. He explained that the City  
followed Columbus specifications, which required a one-foot cutback into the  
apron to maintain proper construction standards. He noted that complaints  
regarding the one-foot cutback had been minimal compared to the total  
number of completed projects during his tenure. Councilmember McGregor  
stated that partial apron work created additional seams, increasing the  
likelihood of deterioration. Senior Director Schultz agreed that seams could  
contribute to deterioration but reiterated that Columbus standards governed  
the City’s approach. He explained that the specifications required minimum  
slab dimensions and that staff followed these standards consistently across  
curb, gutter, and apron work.  
Councilmember Merisa Bowers asked whether clearer communication to  
homeowners could address concerns, specifically by explaining that City  
work included apron replacement up to the one-foot cutback and that  
homeowners could independently contract with the same contractor to  
complete full apron work. Senior Director Schultz responded that the City  
already notified homeowners participating in the program that cutbacks might  
occur. He explained that, in some cases, cutbacks on the driveway side of  
the sidewalk extended up to four feet to ensure proper slope and eliminate  
hazards. He stated that allowing contractors to split work between City and  
homeowner projects created administrative, billing, and warranty  
complications. He emphasized that homeowners retained the option to  
replace their driveway aprons independently. Senior Director Schultz further  
explained that the program had operated for several cycles and predated  
multiple prior city engineers. He stated that staff refined notification letters  
regularly and that the cutback language had been added in recent cycles. He  
acknowledged that staff could review the communication again for clarity.  
Mayor Laurie Jadwin stated that staff could review the homeowner  
communication to ensure clarity and make revisions if needed.  
Councilmember Bowers agreed that there was always room for  
improvement, and Mayor Jadwin remarked that her staff would confirm her  
preference for revisions.  
Vice President Jones asked about an overlap on McCutcheon Road, noting  
that it appeared on both the street and sidewalk program lists, and asked  
whether work would occur simultaneously. Senior Director Schultz explained  
that the street work on McCutcheon involved a preservation sealer applied to  
recently completed pavement, while the sidewalk work fell under the lookback  
program. He stated that the street portion of McCutcheon had been  
completed within the previous three to four years. Vice President Jones  
thanked Senior Director Schultz for the clarification, asked whether there  
were any further questions, and stated that the item would move forward on  
the consent agenda for January 20.  
Recommendation: Introduction/Adoption on Consent Agenda on 1/20/2026.  
D.  
ITEMS FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT:  
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING, APPROVING, AND RATIFYING THE  
SUBMITTED RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE CITY OF GAHANNA TAX  
INCENTIVE REVIEW COUNCIL FOR TAX YEAR 2024  
Jeff Gottke, Director of Economic Development, presented the item regarding  
approval to continue the post-1994 Community Reinvestment Area (CRA) tax  
abatements. He explained that Council considered the Tax Incentive Review  
Council’s (TIRC) recommendation for tax year 2024, noting that the City  
reviewed abatements one year in arrears. He stated that Council previously  
approved the 2023 tax year recommendation and that the City received the  
TIRC minutes in mid-December and placed the item on the agenda as soon  
as possible in January. Director Gottke reminded Council that state law  
required TIRC to recommend whether to continue, modify, or cancel existing  
property tax abatements. He stated that TIRC also reviewed pre-1994 reports  
and tax increment financing (TIF) area reports for informational purposes  
only. He reviewed the composition of TIRC for the year, explaining that  
membership varied by municipality and included representatives from the  
county auditor, commissioners, townships, affected school districts, and  
municipalities. Director Gottke outlined the reporting timeline. He stated that  
the Economic Development Department must submit reports to the Ohio  
Department of Development by March 31. He explained that staff sent  
reporting documents to businesses, followed up through calls, emails, and  
visits, and compiled the information for submission. He noted that TIRC,  
operating at the county level, typically met in mid-summer to review the  
reports and then sent recommendations back to the communities for  
legislative action. He stated that the City ideally completed this process within  
the calendar year, although multiple entities sometimes caused delays.  
Director Gottke explained the separate roles of the Community Reinvestment  
Area Housing Council, which reviewed existing abatements, and TIRC, which  
made formal recommendations to Council. He reported that 13 post-1994  
abatements existed and that TIRC found all 13 in compliance and  
recommended continuation without modification. He noted that one  
abatement expired in 2024, returning approximately $31,000 to the tax rolls.  
Director Gottke reviewed performance data related to job retention, job  
creation, and payroll. He stated that companies outside their job-creation  
windows exceeded their commitments, creating 593 jobs compared to 462  
committed. He reported that total payroll exceeded commitments by  
approximately $15.5 million, resulting in an estimated $630,000 additional  
impact to the City in 2024. He explained that companies self-reported the  
data, and staff verified payroll with the Finance Department and physical  
investment with the county auditor. Director Gottke concluded his  
presentation.  
Councilmember Merisa Bowers thanked Director Gottke and stated that she  
had substantive and procedural questions. She acknowledged additional  
context he provided by email earlier in the day and commented positively on  
local businesses outperforming projections. She asked about the abatement  
for Buckeye Elm Holdings Company LLC, created in 2020, and questioned an  
inconsistency indicating that job creation and payroll would occur by  
December 31, 2024. Director Gottke stated that the information was incorrect  
and clarified that the company had the entire abatement period to create the  
jobs. Councilmember Bowers confirmed that the abatement term was 10  
years at 80 percent. Councilmember Bowers asked what would occur if, at  
the end of the 10-year term, the company fell short of its job-creation  
commitments. Director Gottke responded that CRA abatements did not  
include clawback provisions. Councilmember Bowers expressed concern  
about that structure and asked whether guaranteed performance periods  
might provide better accountability. Director Gottke stated that job-creation  
windows of 36 or 48 months were standard but that each agreement differed,  
and he did not know the specifics of that abatement. Councilmember Bowers  
referenced a 2025 TIRC report containing an economist’s study suggesting  
that abatements did not always deliver expected job creation, while TIFs  
performed better, and stated that Council should keep that in mind. Turning to  
procedural questions, Councilmember Bowers asked why Mifflin Township  
lacked representation at the TIRC meeting. Director Gottke explained that the  
county auditor’s office issued invitations and that he did not know why the  
township did not attend. Councilmember Bowers noted that the City  
representatives listed did not match those confirmed by Council in 2024.  
Director Gottke stated that the confirmed representatives were unavailable  
and that temporary representatives attended so the City would not lack  
representation. Mayor Laurie Jadwin stated that staff reviewed the applicable  
code and believed the action taken complied with what the law permitted.  
Councilmember Bowers cited the Ohio Revised Code and questioned  
whether stand-in appointments were allowed. City Attorney Priya Tamilarasan  
cited Section 5709.85(A)(2), stating that the mayor appointed municipal  
representatives with Council concurrence. She stated that she had not been  
consulted before the meeting and offered to provide guidance in the future.  
Councilmember Bowers asked whether the representation issue affected the  
validity of the TIRC recommendation. City Attorney Tamilarasan stated that  
she needed additional time to assess potential exposure and believed there  
were likely no ramifications but would confirm. Mayor Jadwin asked her to  
also review the implications if the City had not attended the TIRC meeting.  
City Attorney Tamilarasan agreed. Director Gottke noted that the TIRC  
minutes were unofficial and stated that he observed Ms. Brant voting,  
although the audio recording might not reflect it clearly. He stated that  
corrections could occur when TIRC approved the minutes. Councilmember  
Bowers stated that Council would consider confirming appointees at a future  
meeting if needed to ensure a smooth 2025 TIRC review. She asked when  
Council needed to act on the TIRC recommendation. City Attorney  
Tamilarasan stated that Council had 60 days after receiving the county  
minutes to hold a meeting and vote. Director Gottke stated that the City  
received the minutes around December 15 or December 19 and remained  
within the 60-day period. He stated that this meeting was the first committee  
meeting after receipt.  
Councilmember Nancy McGregor questioned whether the clock started when  
Council received the minutes. City Attorney Tamilarasan stated that the code  
referenced receipt by the legislative authority and that she was unsure  
whether receipt by administration constituted receipt by Council.  
Councilmember McGregor noted that the votes were not close and  
questioned whether representation issues affected the outcome.  
Councilmember Bowers noted that was her question to the City Attorney.  
Vice President Jones asked what the situation would be if the City had no  
representatives at all. City Attorney Tamilarasan stated that she would  
research that concern. Vice President Jones asked for further questions or  
discussion. Hearing none, she stated that the legislation would receive first  
reading on January 20, 2026, return to the next Committee of the Whole, and  
come back as a regular item on February 2, 2026, at Councilmember  
Bowers’ request. Vice President Jones thanked Director Gottke for the  
presentation.  
Recommendation: Introduction/First Reading on Regular Agenda on 1/20/2026;  
Further Discussion in Committee of the Whole on 1/26/2026; Second  
Reading/Adoption on Regular Agenda on 2/2/2026.  
E.  
ITEMS FROM THE MAYOR'S OFFICE:  
Charter Review Commission Appointment Announcements  
Mayor Laurie Jadwin followed up on the Council discussion from the  
organizational meeting on January 2, 2026, at which time Council announced  
its appointments to the Charter Review Commission. She explained that,  
because Council announced some appointments at that meeting, she  
delayed announcing her mayoral appointments. Mayor Jadwin announced her  
appointments to the 2026 Charter Review Commission and stated that the  
selected individuals brought a mix of professional experience, community  
involvement, and a commitment to public service. She appointed Richard  
Maxwell, Ray Mularski (consistent with the tradition of appointing the former  
City Attorney to the commission), and Carrin Wester. Mayor Jadwin thanked  
all appointees, on behalf of Council and the City, for their willingness to  
volunteer their time, expertise, and service to the community, and stated that  
she looked forward to the work of the commission in the coming months.  
F.  
ITEMS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS:  
Councilmember Padova:  
Sgt. Coffee Co. Ribbon Cutting  
Councilmember Kaylee Padova announced that a ribbon cutting would take  
place on Thursday, January 22, for SGT Coffee, which opened a coffee bar at  
The Well in the Creekside District at 140 N. Hight Street. She stated that the  
event would occur from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. and that she planned to  
attend and offer recognition. Councilmember Padova invited other  
Councilmembers to attend and asked those interested to notify Clerk  
VanMeter by Tuesday, January 20, 2026, so signatures could be collected at  
the Tuesday night meeting and materials prepared in advance of the event.  
She stated that she would answer any questions.  
Vice President Jamille Jones asked if there were any questions. Hearing  
none, she thanked Councilmember Padova.  
Councilmember Bowers:  
A
JOINT  
RESOLUTION  
AND  
PROCLAMATION  
RECOGNIZING  
JANUARY 19, 2026 AS MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. DAY AND THE  
NATIONAL DAY OF SERVICE IN THE CITY OF GAHANNA AND  
COMMENDING AND CONGRATULATING RETIRED JUDGE JAMES E.  
GREEN FOR HIS LEGACY OF SERVICE AND JUSTICE TO THE  
RESIDENTS OF FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO  
Councilmember Merisa Bowers stated that Council traditionally adopted a  
resolution recognizing Martin Luther King Jr. Day and the National Day of  
Service. She explained that this year also provided an opportunity to highlight  
retired Judge James Green, whom she described as one of Gahanna’s  
strongest advocates for justice. She stated that Judge Green planned to  
attend the meeting and expressed enthusiasm about the recognition. She  
noted that Judge Green reviewed and vetted the information contained in the  
resolution. Councilmember Bowers stated that Judge Green served as a  
31-year veteran of the municipal court and retired effective December 31,  
2025. She added that his birthday occurred the previous week and expressed  
appreciation for recognizing him during his birthday month. She stated that  
Council looked forward to honoring Judge Green and his wife, Rhesa.  
Vice President Jones noted that the item was a joint resolution and  
proclamation and thanked the Mayor for joining in the recognition. She asked  
whether there was any discussion.  
Councilmember Nancy McGregor remarked on a police escort that  
accompanied Judge Green from the courthouse through Gahanna to his  
home and stated that the gesture appeared meaningful and well deserved.  
Councilmember Bowers noted a last-minute correction to the resolution,  
clarifying that Judge Green served five years on the Ohio Supreme Court as  
an administrator rather than six years as general counsel. She stated that the  
corrected information appeared in the current document on Granicus.  
Mayor Jadwin thanked Councilmember Bowers for the invitation to join in the  
joint recognition. She described Judge Green as an exceptional leader, a  
strong representative of Gahanna, and a phenomenal jurist. She stated that  
recognizing his service to both Gahanna and Franklin County would be a  
pleasure.  
Vice President Jones asked the City Attorney for feedback. City Attorney Priya  
Tamilarasan stated that she practiced before Judge Green for 15 years and  
expressed that the recognition was well deserved. She stated her approval of  
the resolution.  
Vice President Jones stated that the resolution would be placed on the  
consent agenda for January 20.  
Recommendation: Introduction/Adoption on Consent Agenda on 1/20/2026.  
Councilmember Jones:  
Resolutions Calendar for 2026  
Vice President Jones stated that the agenda included a list of ceremonial  
resolutions from the prior year. She proposed that Council review the list  
comprehensively and then revisit it on a quarterly basis to determine whether  
to continue the same resolutions, add new ones, or coordinate joint  
resolutions or proclamations with Mayor Jadwin. She explained that the  
discussion that evening would focus on the first quarter of the year. Vice  
President Jones noted that Council would again have a Martin Luther King, Jr.  
Day resolution. She referenced a cervical health awareness month resolution  
from the prior year and stated that no Councilmembers had expressed  
interest in repeating it for the current January.  
Councilmember Merisa Bowers stated that, for a future January, she wanted  
Council to consider recognizing Human Trafficking Prevention Awareness  
Month. She noted that the observance often occurred quickly in January and  
stated that Councilmember Padova was aware of individuals working with  
survivors who could be recognized in conjunction with that month.  
Vice President Jones stated that Council would add that item to the list for  
consideration in the following year. She then provided an update on Black  
History Month, stating that Council planned to adopt a joint resolution and  
proclamation. She explained that she contacted Mayor Jadwin earlier in the  
day and confirmed plans for a special presentation by Tom Gregory on Cora  
Thurman, the first African American graduate of the high school. She stated  
that the presentation would take place before the February 2, 2026 regular  
meeting, beginning at 6:00 p.m., and would include a reception with  
refreshments. She explained that the goal was to invite the community to  
learn about Ms. Thurman’s legacy in Gahanna. She thanked Clerk VanMeter  
for assistance in organizing the event. Vice President Jones stated that  
Council would formally present the resolution during the February 2 meeting  
to Ms. Thurman’s granddaughter and to Mr. Gregory, and that formal  
invitations would be extended to Council and administration. Vice President  
Jones asked whether there was discussion on other items on the list.  
Councilmember Michael Schnetzer stated that, although the discussion  
focused on the first quarter, he wanted to comment more broadly because he  
would not attend the next committee meeting. He noted that the list included  
approximately 17 ceremonial resolutions and expressed concern about the  
volume. He suggested tightening the list by limiting the number of resolutions  
per Councilmember or by applying qualitative criteria, such as recognizing  
meritorious service or significant achievements. He stated that multiple  
resolutions could detract from Council’s capacity to focus on day-to-day City  
business.  
Councilmember Kaylee Padova stated that she understood the concern but  
emphasized the importance of ceremonial resolutions in engaging community  
members who might not otherwise attend Council meetings. She stated that  
recognizing organizations, groups, and individuals helped connect residents  
to City government. She noted that Council typically limited presentations to  
one per meeting, occasionally two, and stated that recognizing residents and  
community members remained an important part of Council’s role.  
Vice President Jones stated that she also supported some reduction but  
emphasized the importance of maintaining recognition of heritage and  
awareness months, such as Black History Month, Women’s History Month,  
and LGBTQ-related observances. She noted that the City did not otherwise  
formally recognize those events and stated that Council resolutions provided  
an important opportunity to do so. She asked whether Council would support  
bringing the matter back to a future committee meeting with  
recommendations to streamline the list. Councilmember Bowers expressed  
support. Vice President Jones stated that Clerk VanMeter and she would  
review the 2025 list, make recommendations, and bring the matter back to a  
future committee.  
President Trenton Weaver asked Mayor Jadwin whether there were any joint  
proclamations or resolutions not on the list that she anticipated bringing  
forward and for which she might invite Council participation. Mayor Jadwin  
responded that she did not plan her proclamations on a full-year calendar.  
She explained that past joint proclamations resulted either from Council  
inviting her to participate or from her inviting Council to join. She noted that  
some proclamations occurred outside Council Chambers within the  
community. She stated that most recurring items already appeared on the list  
and suggested continuing the discussion on streamlining before identifying  
any additional items.  
Vice President Jones thanked everyone for the feedback and stated that  
Council would proceed with reviewing and potentially trimming the list at a  
future committee meeting. She noted consensus on proceeding with the  
Martin Luther King Jr. Day resolution and Black History Month recognition.  
Recommendation: Further Discussion in Committee of the Whole scheduled on  
1/26/2026.  
G.  
ADJOURNMENT:  
With no further business before the Committee of the Whole, the Chair  
adjourned the meeting at 7:57 p.m.